I'll try to be brief. First, I apologize to you for my comment that you "hate Hank Haney's guts". It was a poor choice of words. Let it suffice to say that you're not one of his biggest fans, and we'll leave it at that. I would still contend that a respected journalist like Jaime Diaz would not attach himself to a project that is as lacking in veracity as you suggest this is. There could indeed be more to this story than meets the eye, but I'm confident that will come to light if warranted.
Again, I don't disagree that media scrutiny should be more evenly distributed, but we're both dreaming if we think that'll happen. Nobody cares about Matt Every. For that matter few, other than those who follow the PGA Tour closely, have ever heard of him. On the other hand, when the #1 sports figure on the planet gets involved in the mess that Tiger did, it's nothing less than a feeding frenzy, to say the least. I'm not saying it's right, but it is what it is.
You make an interesting point regarding the race issue, and you're probably right about that. I'm sure the PGA Tour has been less than ecstatic over the years that the best player in the world was not a Caucasian. I do, however, respectfully disagree with your assertion that, if the events of November 2009 had involved Phil M. rather than Tiger, that the coverage would have different. It goes back to the fact that, like Tiger, everyone knows who Phil is. TMZ and all of the other tabloid outlets would have been all over it, maybe even worse than with Tiger, due to Phil's goody-goody reputation.
I wish I had more time to spend here right now, but work calls. Later...