rick reilly

espn.go.com/video/clip?id=8167900&categoryid=2630020

 

dan jenkins

espn.go.com/golf/britishopen12/story/_/id/8145462/dan-jenkins-major-record-unlikely-topped

 

 

 

 

thanks for the post.

reilly could've just as easily led with, what if tiger breaks nicklaus' majors record, if he wanted to, but decided to go negative instead. as for jenkins, being part of the 'greatest generation', he doesn't recognize tiger because he simply doesn't want to. let me never get that old.

Are you people serious.  These are sportwriters who report what they see and hear.  When Tiger isn't playing well, they say so.  When he plays well, they say so.  I haven't seen any articles where they say Tiger will never win again.  They may say they don't think he will win another major.  Try keeping it real around here.

tiger said it himself...

www.usatoday.com/sports/golf/pga/story/2012-07-01/att-national-tiger-woods-wins/55964630/1

"Well, a lot of media people didn't think I could win again, and I had to deal with those questions for quite a bit," Woods said.

can't get any more real than that...

let the list continue...

Did anybody put Chambleep on the list yet

LOL

Oh yes...

Bramble sits ATOP the list!!!!

L M F A O

I like him.  Need diversity and differing opinion to make it interesting. What a bore if they were all like the sniveling sycophant Rymer. 

While I agree that differing opinions are welcome, Bramble has been spewing "Tiger-Hate" for years now.

I usually MUTE him when he appears on GCTV.

On a scale of 1-10, where "1" is terrible, and "10" is outstanding, I rate Bramble as

-5568682268989556568333.2

Tiger Hate? Never heard him go down that road.  I've heard him give a heartfelt opinion. I don't see hate.

 If you mute him how  do you know what he's saying?  How can you give a valued opinion on something you  can't hear?  LOL