Paranoia will destroy 'ya.

 

 

STALKING  . . . WILL DESTROY YOU.

:)

You are incorrect. He/she did not appear on this website AFTER Tiger had missed the cut. As can be seen by everyone, the post was made on May 2 before the tournament even started. This discussion board is plagued by your constant barrages and make Tiger fans leave. Please stop telling posters they are not true Tiger fans and to leave this board. 

And I wonder who needs to "get over" what. It seems impossible for you to avoid attacking personal details of my life. This is a discussion board and everyone may give a different opinion or state what is wrong with mine. Please stop your constant attacks on personal -- and irrelevant -- aspects of my life.

Your coconspirator Beat also cannot refrain from personal attacks. Her sweeping statements on who is even "in a position to" have an opinion or simply "understand" anything takes away from the argument. It undermines the specifics and does not help her case. Please attack what is published rather than who.

 

(All countries import expertise and so does the United States. It is actually not a big deal. But on a bad hair day, it is nice to have a piece of paper signed by the INS saying I am "special". You are special too.)

 

By the way, the word "incognito" means disguised/concealed identity. We are all incognito on here.

If by "incognito, again", you actually meant me disappearing, I have no problem admitting that the personality attacks make me leave the board from time to time. However, the excitement of Tiger's game eventually make me return. I also know he would not want me to leave. 

 

        FOR  "special"  GALS . . .

Chairman of the INS

Eye approved this message .

            

                           

Your coconspirator Beat also cannot refrain from personal attacks. Her sweeping statements on who is even "in a position to" have an opinion or simply "understand" anything takes away from the argument. It undermines the specifics and does not help her case. Please attack what is published rather than who.

I have not said anything to you in a long time. I usually read your comment, chuckle and kim (keep it moving.)

When have I prevented or tried to prevent anyone on this site from having an opinion? I'll wait.

I am not blonde. (But it is irrelevant. Or racist to consider relevant.)  

Foreigners may be at a disadvantage for information. It is common courtesy to help a foreigner out and should be on this board as well. To actually hold it against someone before they open their mouth goes against everything that America stands for. (My own citizenships are irrelevant.) 

You really see horns where they do not exist and make illogical leaps on who is against Tiger. I have for parts of my life been at an advantage to information about Tiger's European ex-wife and corrected the many false statements made about her on this board. It does not make me against Tiger.

Ocean, I wouldn't waste your time trying to reason with Eye. She clearly has an agenda, and is not interested in having any sort of meaningful discussion. Those of us who have a brain can see that you are not anti-Tiger.

When? I do not keep track of all your personal attacks. But you have on numerous occassions told me I am "not in a position to have an opinion" or to not use terms that I "do not understand" (often after you have made an incorrect definition, such as confusing trade libel with defamatory statement). I have been away from the board for a long time because of your personal attacks. Just stick to attacking what is published and do not take it one step further by attacking the person. If you cannot do it for me, try it for yourself as it would help your argument rather than ruining it.