Funny how these two have something to say about Tiger on the same day.
Greg Norman has always been very bitter about success of others because he was unable to replicate the Major Championship success that many thought he would have.
I have never liked Greg Norman, he has always been way too arrogant for my liking and I don't feel like he was as good as he thought he was. He was all hype. He wasn't even the player that he thought he was. Faldo, Seve and Tom Watson were all better players than Norman was.
What Faldo said has some truth to it. However, it doesn't change the fact that Tiger is still better than his competition. Maybe players won't crumble when they see Tiger on the leader board, but he still has more talent than anyone.
The connection between the two will be forever. One guy was the worst closer or biggest choker in major championships of the past 36 years and the other directly benefited from other golfers' big failures down the stretch in half his major wins.
Anything said by almost anyone will get some coverage if it is about Tiger. It's funny, the young golfers have not seen anything close to Tiger's best, so maybe thiese views change over the next years.
I'm with you 1000 % , perfect anolgy w/ Federer...even though I'm a Rafa fan...Thanks.