poundingnails said...
that must mean it was an American citizen who did this?
Oh, not just any old American citizen; a 'white' one. Under obama, that is why it is being called a 'terrorist' attack; rather than state crimes of murder.
Under obama, 12 murders by a 'white' American is a terrorist attack; right off the bat! Just like the 'white' cop, Under obama, was deemed a racist when he dared to question the Black Professor.
Under obama, 3,000 murders at the hands of al-Qaeda associates were NOT terrorist attacks. They were acts of 'revenge' brought on by the wrongful acts of the American 'white' culture.
Under obama, 13 murders at Fort Hood were 13 murders when committed by a non-white American who expressed support for terrorists.
Is obama engaging in multiple acts of profiling?
Does obama believe '2 wrongs make a right'? Is that obama's notion of 'fairness'?
obama aside, I pray for the individuals victimized by the deranged killer. It's good he was taken out. Maybe if someone had exercised their right to bear arms they could have taken him out sooner and saved some of those lives lost today. The same is true for the Batman incident a couple weeks ago. Someone should have been armed; and taken him out.
If there is any 'human right' at all it is the right of Self-Defense! It certainly is NOT the right to cross borders without first obtaining permission.
poundingnails said...
when an other than American does this it is a man made disaster.
i still believe those trying to grab guns are behind these things somehow
I have to agree, nails. Anyone capable of engaging in the Fast and Furious Operation is surely capable of engaging in something of this sort.
With that said, I acknowledge that this may very well be the work of just another deranged individual. After all, we have no shortage of them. e.g., Ted Bundy; Jeffrey Dahmer; John Wayne Gacy; Robert Lee Yates; Jim Jones; David Koresh; Charles Dederich; L. Ron Hubbard. All of these individuals targeted certain other individuals to momentarily satisfy some internal disturbance from which they suffer.
Restricting the right to bear arms is not the solution to the insanity of madness. It would only serve to make us more vulernable to the insanity of madness within our communities; as well as more vulernable to corrupt, abusive government officials who betray their Oath and The People's Trust.
Edited 8/5/12 by sir_jean