Hopefully I can get a response out of Don today because I have a few questions about your article "Bark Worse Than Bite" in the 11-25-2002 edition.  From what I get in the article, you are suggesting that Mike Sherman's bark is worse than his bite because he didn't get into a physical confrontation with Warren Sapp.  If that is what you are implying, there is a world that I live in where people act like grown ups.  Mike Sherman voiced his displessure with what Warren did, point blank, isn't he allowed to do that without getting in a fist fight.  What Warren did was legal, and he shouldn't be fined, but it was cheap.  You can't tell me that he seriously thought that Clifton was going to get Kelley, he wasn't even close to him.  Sapp saw a defensless player and lined up for the hit.  Football is a game, don't know if you knew that, but that's what it is.  YOu do what you have to , to win.  That hit had nothing to do with the outcome of the game and that is what is wrong with it.  Anyone with a brain knows that when you deliver a violent blow like that, their is a good chance an injury will occur.  If you can do that and then celebrate about it after the player is laying on the ground, then that is pretty cheap and sick.  Maybe I'm wrong, maybe violence is the answer and that's how I should solve all me problems.